<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Basic Human Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://projectmultiplexer.com/2009/09/23/basic-human-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://projectmultiplexer.com/2009/09/23/basic-human-rights/</link>
	<description>Ramblings in a State of Insanity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zenith</title>
		<link>http://projectmultiplexer.com/2009/09/23/basic-human-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>zenith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectmultiplexer.com/?p=190#comment-158</guid>
		<description>(I have changed my theme AGAIN.  But this doesn&#039;t have the comments issue.)

Lots of people disagreed with me vocally over on LJ about how health is not a right but a commodity.  But there&#039;s sort of a strange dualism going on here.  It&#039;s okay that we have a system of public schools to which everyone citizen not only has right to use but up to age 16 is /compelled/ to use, complete with teachers who are /compelled/ to teach.  But we cannot have the same standard for basic health care.

Maybe we&#039;d be better off if we were a society of illiterate sick people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(I have changed my theme AGAIN.  But this doesn&#8217;t have the comments issue.)</p>
<p>Lots of people disagreed with me vocally over on LJ about how health is not a right but a commodity.  But there&#8217;s sort of a strange dualism going on here.  It&#8217;s okay that we have a system of public schools to which everyone citizen not only has right to use but up to age 16 is /compelled/ to use, complete with teachers who are /compelled/ to teach.  But we cannot have the same standard for basic health care.</p>
<p>Maybe we&#8217;d be better off if we were a society of illiterate sick people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://projectmultiplexer.com/2009/09/23/basic-human-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectmultiplexer.com/?p=190#comment-157</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t even begin to add anything to what you say here. I think I know people who agree with this jackass, but they don&#039;t have the guts to talk about it where anyone can actually hear them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t even begin to add anything to what you say here. I think I know people who agree with this jackass, but they don&#8217;t have the guts to talk about it where anyone can actually hear them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zenith</title>
		<link>http://projectmultiplexer.com/2009/09/23/basic-human-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>zenith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectmultiplexer.com/?p=190#comment-155</guid>
		<description>I will accept that it is the responsibility of an affluent and developed modern economy to provide a floor of very basic health care to all who happen to live within the borders of the country.  Is it a basic human right?  That&#039;s a debatable point.  Is it something that a real country should do?  I believe absolutely so.  

I find people who want to deny basic health care because of pure classist reasons (&#039;you&#039;re too poor to have a good job to provide you health care!&quot;) to be the lowest level of human life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will accept that it is the responsibility of an affluent and developed modern economy to provide a floor of very basic health care to all who happen to live within the borders of the country.  Is it a basic human right?  That&#8217;s a debatable point.  Is it something that a real country should do?  I believe absolutely so.  </p>
<p>I find people who want to deny basic health care because of pure classist reasons (&#8216;you&#8217;re too poor to have a good job to provide you health care!&#8221;) to be the lowest level of human life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://projectmultiplexer.com/2009/09/23/basic-human-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectmultiplexer.com/?p=190#comment-154</guid>
		<description>A basic human right is really tough to define.  Do we have a right not to be sick?  Well, in the natural world people get sick, injured, die... do we have a right to expect anything different?  However, I think the human right argument is the wrong way to approach it.  What we really should be asking is &quot;Do we, as an affluent and developed culture and country, have the *responsibility* to provide some level of basic care to those who are unable to provide for themselves.&quot;  My answer is an unequivocal yes.  But then, as a paramedic, it would be difficult for me to morally justify watching someone go into cardiac arrest in front of me and I simply step over and ignore them instead of using my resources and skills to try to help them.  The debate is being twisted... it isn&#039;t some bum who won&#039;t work and won&#039;t take care of himself... it is our neighbor, our parents, our kids, and ourselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A basic human right is really tough to define.  Do we have a right not to be sick?  Well, in the natural world people get sick, injured, die&#8230; do we have a right to expect anything different?  However, I think the human right argument is the wrong way to approach it.  What we really should be asking is &#8220;Do we, as an affluent and developed culture and country, have the *responsibility* to provide some level of basic care to those who are unable to provide for themselves.&#8221;  My answer is an unequivocal yes.  But then, as a paramedic, it would be difficult for me to morally justify watching someone go into cardiac arrest in front of me and I simply step over and ignore them instead of using my resources and skills to try to help them.  The debate is being twisted&#8230; it isn&#8217;t some bum who won&#8217;t work and won&#8217;t take care of himself&#8230; it is our neighbor, our parents, our kids, and ourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

